This is a
reactionary piece which relates to feminism and the rhetoric of
feminists. This is not meant to be offensive or mean. This is just my
reaction to things I read and how I feel about it. This topic primarily came up after reading my good friend's blog. But it really pertains to all feminist opinion based articles.
I believe in fairness and equity and I am for the most part a
strong feminist. I would say with my introduction into queer
theory that I'm a bit queerer than some and less queer than others
but that's hardly the point. I want to discuss the state of feminism
and the way that people frame their life stories to become an issue
of feminism. Many of my friends would label themselves as feminists,
and with so many branches of feminism it's a fair label and it's a
noble cause. They believe in equal treatment of women and they oppose
patriarchy which has throughout history dismissed women as either
being fully human or being treated fairly based off of their own
merits.
However, this is
one of the issues I see feminists that I know get into. The frame of the
argument being within their merits, they often disregard
intersectionality and the affects of their own arguments in
replicating and regulating what they see as injustice. Many of my
friends are indeed white, middle class, feminists and the arguments
are often framed in a light which promotes the ideal of how women
should be treated as well as how women should act with the
perspective from that standpoint. This limitation of seeing women
from only their social space.
Side note: Many feminists that I know project their expectations of how women ought to behave when they have feminist debates which reenforces a discourse of what women ought to be, which is funnily the thing we try to oppose. This often comes in the form of opinions about how women ought to act and rebuking behavior, I see this often with slut shaming. Which often happens off handedly by saying I dressed slutty and did XYZ, or that girl's slutty and has a lot of boyfriends. This regulates behavior and suggests that there is a right way of being a woman.
Although opinions are a fair assessment of your personal experience it does not reflect an
intersectional perspective nor does it denote that this is a limited
scope due to your own privilege or position.
I know I'm just
poking at a pet peeve of mine but feminism must have context and
assess the privilege of the speaker. The idea that everyone in the
world who is a woman receives this reaction because they are women is
absurd. Think of women who don't have the same privileges. The women
you call sluts, the women you think have too many children, the women
you would label as unmarriable due to their social position, age, how
able their body is, their gender, their physical appearance or their
mental handicaps. Do they also fit into this limited view? Do people
also reflect onto them the same “disadvantage” or annoyance that
you deal with? Probably not.
A woman who is disabled or who is not in
a monogamous heterosexual relationship probably won't be asked the
same questions. So please, please keep your feminist perspective in
focus and within context. Please view things with your own privileges
in mind before you put out an opinion piece about how people
generally behave towards women. It is true that romantic
relationships are the focus of people's conversation, mainly that
have to do with the heterosexual matrix of it being monogamous and
heterosexual. It is true that mostly women's worth is derived from
their relationship with men, especially in third world countries
where you're worth is in relation with your family which in turn
reflects on the patriarch of the family. But can you really
generalize?
Are women really treated this way? And if they are,
deconstruct why it happens. Or who it doesn't happen to? And why you
find the exceptions ask why they are exceptional and what structures
make it so they fall beyond the norm. Why is it that you think/ or
people think that way? What norms are they
transgressing? Why is it that you are regulating their life by
suggesting or thinking of them as non-normative?
I suppose my take
away message of this is that opinions are one thing. But please do
not generalize and if you do, back it up. Feminism is not just a
reflection of your life and the disadvantages you see, although that
maybe a part of it. Rather, think of your own privileges, analyze why
things are the way they are and do not assume that because it happens
to you it must happen to everyone or that people were blind to this
injustice before you pointed it out. Often times the people who are
dismissed from the discourse entirely are the ones with the most to
say. Your rhetoric and your anger over injustices reflects how you
see the world and also exemplifies where you see people and your
expectations of behavior.
Not that you need my approval, of course. But huge props for writing this. Hope it's not a one-off
ReplyDeleteSince you and I talk all the time I know you don't really need to know my opinion. But the comment about the slut thing kind of always boggles me. I mean, why is it that women are sluts if they have many partners but guys are "lucky" or good if they do? Is that because we're a male centered society? Or because we put limitations on ourselves? I would in general call them a degrading term only in the fact that it's kinda gross when you think of the fact that you would be essentially making out with all the people your partner has been making out with if they have multiple partners. But I'm all for making bad names for both genders. Dunno. Just thought I'd voice my opinion.
ReplyDelete